APIA Blog

RSS Feed

Peter Lewis: DTI will not solve the housing crisis

Tuesday, November 22, 2016

 


Reserve bank Governor Graham Wheeler has been working for some time to reduce the risk that he sees in the New Zealand banking system, mainly centred on house price inflation and low dairy product returns.

He has already attempted to restrain the demand for housing by introducing restrictions in investor loan-to-value ratios, thus limiting the amount that the main trading banks can lend to those who are buying property.

Although these restrictions have resulted in some, mainly short term, reduction in demand the rate of increase in housing prices seems to be largely unrestrained.

Another weapon that is available to the Bank would be the introduction of a debt to income ratio for borrowers. A debt income ratio (often abbreviated DTI) is the percentage of a consumer's income that goes toward paying debts. As house prices rise so has the debt within households in relation to their income – i.e. the debt-to-income ratios. A DTI limit could slow this trend and reduce the consequential financial instability.

Wheeler has already stated that “We have had positive initial discussions with the Minister of Finance on amending the Memorandum of Understanding on Macro-prudential policy to include this instrument.”

Debt-to-income restrictions are already used in the United Kingdom, where most owner-occupier buyers cannot get a mortgage higher than 4.5 times their annual earnings. However, it is not widely appreciated that these restrictions do not apply to buy-to-let investors (i.e. rental property investors) under the current UK scheme.

There seems to be the intention that, if implemented in New Zealand, because most lending that is high debt-to-income is to investors, it would apply to all lending and hence impact investors more than owner-occupiers.

Others disagree.  Labour politicians don't think these limits should be used here. "We have concerns that blanket debt to income ratios will exclude even more first home buyers from getting into a home," finance spokesman Grant Robertson has said. "More than a third of lending to owner-occupiers in the year to May was at a debt-to-income ratio of five or more."

However, there are also disadvantages to implementing a debt-to-income limit.

The proposal would appear to advantage overseas buyers who either have ready cash available or who could arrange access to loans outside the New Zealand banking system, as it would reduce competition from local buyers who would be affected by the restrictions.

Limiting households’ opportunities to borrow would also slow consumption and economic activity.

A debt-to-income limit entails that some households are forced to borrow less than what they consider to be optimal. This means that the households’ ability to smooth their consumption over the life cycle is limited, which in turn leads to the households achieving a lower welfare than if they were able to borrow more.

For example, young-person households in general have lower salaries at the beginning of their professional lives, but often very good salary potential. By applying a debt-to-income limit, the banks’ possibilities of assessing the households’ potential payment capacity disappear to some extent since it is current income that forms the basis for the credit assessment even though a mortgage has a term of many years. A debt-to-income limit can thus make it difficult for young households with good creditworthiness to enter the housing market. A debt-to-income limit is also more limiting for households in the higher income groups than, for example, limits to discretionary income.

By limiting how much households may borrow, a debt-to-income limit also entails a decrease in both consumption and GDP, at least in the short term.

Like many interventions, the introduction of a debt to income rule will have an impact initially but there are likely to be side-effects too. There will be some people that want to buy a home and can afford the repayments but may not be able to fit the income criteria required.

The key question surely is not ‘Can We Do It’ but ‘Does It Work?’

The UK limits were imposed in June 2014. House prices across the UK rose 6 per cent in 2015. In May 2016 estate agents Stirling Ackroyd announced that most of London's property market has seen values rise by 8.2 per cent during the past year. Of course it could be argued that without the DTI these price rises would have been greater, but no-one could prove that either way.

Whilst a DTI could slow down the local market, it is still seen as a band-aid solution to a bigger problem. The fact is there is an imbalance between supply and demand of property, particularly in Auckland where mortgages tend to be the largest in New Zealand. We maintain that increasing supply rather than artificially throttling demand is the only sensible long-term solution.

 

Recent Posts


Tags

legal cost winz interest rates Q&A HHS tenant covid-19 Jeff Bezos structure principal and interest privacy tenancy services HSWA property maintenance renovation finance quiet enjoyment Tribunal case study HHGA house prices rent increase auckland council DTI cat CoreLogic capital gain mindset off the plan productivity extractor fan rent Holler banking Must know asbestos re agent warm up new zealand minor dwelling insulation watercare boarding house commerce commission retaliatory notice warren buffett Investment tip equity property value khh landlord heater brightline early termination education insurance initio beginner investor anz rta reform termination damage legal government rental wof investor ird fixed-term tenancy property cycle investment strategy parry v inglis airbnb bond smoke alarm Standards New Zealand clnz robert kiyosaki RTAA 2019 cash-flow mortgage auckland opes partners election2020 inspection interest only nzpif Editor's Choice rental market positive cash flow gluckman report negotiation ask an expert housing bubble management first home buying short-term rental rent arrears unitary plan will wins rta water bill How to return lvr tax debt enforcement sublease partners bankruptcy bad tenant rtaa2020 subdivision election 2017 personal growth reserve bank holiday house property housing affordability cgt relationship maintenance Kris Pedersen Mortgages and Insurance Market report Case study skill shortage sale and purchase Level 4 tenancy tribunal worksafe wealth creation heat pump market rent property management tenancy issues development RBNZ buying apia scotney williams housing package ventilation twg report daikin heating meth sale and purchas letting Gluckman Sponsored post trademe Property (Relationships) Act market income speculator Investor story TCIT kiwibuild Must knows yield p lab property apprentice data security CCC shower dome LIM buyer's agent television recycling equity interest deductibility letting fee rent control meth contamination financial advisers act advice building ocr bond form buying rules shortland chartered accountants Guest blog anti-social behaviour Question and answer ring-fencing business trust trespass Landlording barfoot and thompson

Archive

Introducing Our Partners
Principal Sponsor - Kris Pedersen Mortgages & Insurance logo Gold Sponsor - Barfoot & Thompson logo Gold Sponsor - CoreLogic logo Property Apprentice logo The Insulation Warehouse logo The Renovation Team logo The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation logo
09 360 2376
info@apia.org.nz

The Tenancy Practice Service and TPS Credit Control work closely with the Auckland Property Investors' Association. Our vision of bringing helpful resources, documents and high quality services to Auckland Property Investors and Property Managers is shared by APIA, so its a partnership that works well. 

The Auckland Property Investors' Association is a great organisation for those who want access to advice and information from a range of industry experts and partners. 



Mathieu Holt- Managing Director, The Tenancy Practice Service & TPS Credit Control
Through the Association I found the channels and methods to fund the purchase of property I never dreamed about. Grant Brown

All round it has been one of those things Neil and I felt was really worthwhile belonging to. We have learned so much it has just built our confidence in what we are doing.

Janice Bieleski
I read two articles in the monthly magazine that saved me over $5,000. That is my membership fee for the next 26 years and I am sure I will learn a whole lot more! John Duncan
Fantastic organisation. The networking opportunities are brilliant and provide us with information and opportunities that cannot be obtained anywhere else. We learn something new at every meeting and we've been in this game for nearly 20 years. Pauline and Gyanen Kumar

I find the information obtained from various APIA meetings very useful in guiding my own property investment and rental management.  I also enjoy the networking opportunities with like-minded investors.  I am inspired by other investors’ success and find the more experiences and knowledge that I share with others, the more confident I become.  

Thanks to all APIA event organizers and administrators for your brilliant work. 

Stella Shao

I like talking to people and learning from their experience because it gives me the confidence to invest well. I think it is a knowledge thing. I now know I am doing things the right way.

Stephen Weatherall

My APIA membership has become a total success.

Every time I attend a monthly or regional meeting I come away with so many useful and positive tips that have added value to my property investments and management.

Not only that, the website is a great place for practical advice and useful information. It has now evolved into an important resource for my business.

Talk about value for money! The discounts I have been getting at Bunnings when I present my APIA membership card have more than paid for my annual subscription!

Tim Duffett, Plan A Investments Limited