APIA Blog

RSS Feed

Meth: a tale of woe

Friday, February 10, 2017


Peter Lewis recounts the below experience of an APIA member clawing his way through a meth contamination nightmare.  Take a read: 

Joe (not his real name of course) owns a property in the northern suburbs of Auckland. There are three residential houses on this property, and Joe rents them all out to support himself in his old age.

After one of the houses became vacant, Joe retained the property management department of a large Real Estate firm to find replacement tenants. They sought applicants for the tenancy of the three bedroom house, carried out the appropriate checks, signed up the new tenants on a fixed term tenancy and they moved in during May 2015.

The tenants were a couple with three school-age children. As the parents were unemployed, the rent was payable directly from their WINZ benefit to Joe.

Joe then took over the management of the property.

He immediately encountered problems with late night partying disturbing other residents and undesirable acquaintances hanging around the property.

Matters came to a head in February 2016 when the tenants turned hostile.

A regular property inspection (as allowed under the Residential Tenancies Act) was carried out in July 2016. Four methamphetamine tests at that time give a positive result. That inspection also found that the tenants had done significant damage to the property.

Two weeks later, Joe was featured in a news article on the difficult lives that residential landlords lead, and in particular, the methamphetamine issue was discussed.

The following weekend the tenants at the property vacated without notice, despite the fixed-term tenancy still having seven months to run.

Although they had removed some of their possessions as they departed when Joe was authorised to enter the property by the Tenancy Tribunal he was faced with removing and dumping seven loads of worthless furniture and rubbish at a cost of $1638.

Joe’s insurance company required Joe to carry out further meth testing costing $552 at his own expense before they took any meaningful interest in Joe’s claim under the landlord’s extension to his house policy.

The insurance company then engaged their own meth testing agency to carry out more extensive testing and provide a report on the required remediation. These indicated serious levels of meth contamination so extensive that Joe is faced with stripping out all carpeting, soft board ceilings, wall linings, all the cabinets, cupboards, wardrobes, doors and possibly window frames removed, the new heat pump and even the kitchen stove. On this basis, Joe will be left with only the timber framing, exterior cladding, timber flooring and iron roof.

This work was carried out in November, and the necessary retest was done in early December and failed to meet the necessary standard. More work then took place over a further two weeks by the remediators and yet another test was done mid-December. This also failed. With contamination levels between 0.65 and 1.07 μg/100cm2 in places. Following even more work the property finally tested clear on 24th January, five months after the tenants vacated the property.

Soon after the tenants departed, Joe lodged a claim with the Tenancy Tribunal for access to the rental bond, which the tenants had lodged with tenancy Services. This bond, equal to four weeks rent, was eventually paid out to him but does not come anywhere near covering his actual costs. As Joe does not now know where the ex-tenants are living he cannot lodge a further claim against them for his losses as the window of opportunity that the claim process allows has now passed. In order to reopen the case, Joe applied for a continuation hearing at the end of October. The application was acknowledged, but he heard no more. Three months later he enquired what was happening about this application, and was astonished to get the response “it looks as though this has gone through a twist and perhaps the Court schedulers have missed our request.” Obviously no urgency there. With this astonishing inefficiency you have to ask are they working for the luckless landlord or the absconding tenant?

So eventually Joe has a decontaminated house back. A hollowed-out and stripped decontaminated house. No floor coverings, no stove, no light fittings, no curtains, no architraves, no ventilation system and a lot of the paint scraped down to bare timber. He now has his work cut out to get all of this back together into rent-able state. To make matters even worse, the actually physical damage that the tenants did to the property by breaking windows and damaging other parts of the property is classed as a separate claim (or most likely several separate claims) on his insurance, each which will be reduced in value by the amount of his excess.

Will this sad situation continue? Already landlords are dropping out of the housing market, insurance companies are talking of cutting back or even eliminating their meth remediation cover, and the rental housing shortage is getting worse. There is the prospect of an updated methamphetamine contamination Standard later this year. Will it suffice to solve the problem? Probably not. It is a social problem as well as a legislative one. Action is needed urgently to hold tenants such as these fully responsible for the damage they do and the stress they inflict on others.


Peter Lewis currently serves as the Vice President of the Auckland Property Investors' Association ("APIA").

 

The APIA, as well as the New Zealand Property Investors' Federation, have both put in submissions on Standards New Zealand's Draft Number DZ8510 - NZS8510 - Testing and decontamination of methamphetamine-contaminated properties.  Meth contamination is impacting the rental market in an unprecedently and destructive way.  We urge all landlords to participate in the consultation process to influence the outcome of the eventual standard.  Note that public submission for DZ8510 closes Monday 20th February.  Click here to download a copy of APIA's submission.

Recent Posts


Tags

anz cash-flow auckland council Q&A inspection CoreLogic rta DTI nzpif water bill rent landlord rental wof Must know smoke alarm ocr cgt sale and purchas letting fee tenancy issues ring-fencing boarding house rent increase How to robert kiyosaki Must knows buyer's agent property cycle property value HSWA auckland Standards New Zealand Editor's Choice beginner investor wealth creation minor dwelling parry v inglis management first home buying education television tax skill shortage tenant fixed-term tenancy RBNZ Guest blog housing affordability speculator privacy damage data security debt enforcement partners extractor fan investment strategy Market report principal and interest Investor story cat government legal meth Jeff Bezos unitary plan initio sale and purchase tenancy tribunal p lab winz equity subdivision watercare building productivity election 2017 trust buying twg report rta reform positive cash flow market Landlording banking insulation worksafe development bond TCIT warm up new zealand CCC Holler Question and answer maintenance mortgage bond form airbnb reserve bank termination Investment tip holiday house house prices ask an expert property maintenance negotiation off the plan meth contamination property personal growth LIM Gluckman buying rules return HHGA property management investor scotney williams structure Sponsored post market rent capital gain ventilation bad tenant asbestos heater trademe ird short-term rental Kris Pedersen Mortgages and Insurance trespass income relationship interest only interest rates gluckman report sublease renovation advice HHS rental market letting insurance clnz wins tenancy services rent arrears Property (Relationships) Act business shower dome financial advisers act Tribunal case study finance warren buffett RTAA 2019 housing bubble lvr heating

Archive

Introducing Our Partners
Principal Sponsor - Kris Pedersen Mortgages & Insurance logo Gold Sponsor - Barfoot & Thompson logo Gold Sponsor - CoreLogic logo Property Apprentice logo The Insulation Warehouse logo The Renovation Team logo The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation logo
09 360 2376
info@apia.org.nz

The Tenancy Practice Service and TPS Credit Control work closely with the Auckland Property Investors' Association. Our vision of bringing helpful resources, documents and high quality services to Auckland Property Investors and Property Managers is shared by APIA, so its a partnership that works well. 

The Auckland Property Investors' Association is a great organisation for those who want access to advice and information from a range of industry experts and partners. 



Mathieu Holt- Managing Director, The Tenancy Practice Service & TPS Credit Control
Through the Association I found the channels and methods to fund the purchase of property I never dreamed about. Grant Brown

All round it has been one of those things Neil and I felt was really worthwhile belonging to. We have learned so much it has just built our confidence in what we are doing.

Janice Bieleski
I read two articles in the monthly magazine that saved me over $5,000. That is my membership fee for the next 26 years and I am sure I will learn a whole lot more! John Duncan
Fantastic organisation. The networking opportunities are brilliant and provide us with information and opportunities that cannot be obtained anywhere else. We learn something new at every meeting and we've been in this game for nearly 20 years. Pauline and Gyanen Kumar

I find the information obtained from various APIA meetings very useful in guiding my own property investment and rental management.  I also enjoy the networking opportunities with like-minded investors.  I am inspired by other investors’ success and find the more experiences and knowledge that I share with others, the more confident I become.  

Thanks to all APIA event organizers and administrators for your brilliant work. 

Stella Shao

I like talking to people and learning from their experience because it gives me the confidence to invest well. I think it is a knowledge thing. I now know I am doing things the right way.

Stephen Weatherall

My APIA membership has become a total success.

Every time I attend a monthly or regional meeting I come away with so many useful and positive tips that have added value to my property investments and management.

Not only that, the website is a great place for practical advice and useful information. It has now evolved into an important resource for my business.

Talk about value for money! The discounts I have been getting at Bunnings when I present my APIA membership card have more than paid for my annual subscription!

Tim Duffett, Plan A Investments Limited