APIA Blog

RSS Feed

Meth: a tale of woe

Friday, February 10, 2017


Peter Lewis recounts the below experience of an APIA member clawing his way through a meth contamination nightmare.  Take a read: 

Joe (not his real name of course) owns a property in the northern suburbs of Auckland. There are three residential houses on this property, and Joe rents them all out to support himself in his old age.

After one of the houses became vacant, Joe retained the property management department of a large Real Estate firm to find replacement tenants. They sought applicants for the tenancy of the three bedroom house, carried out the appropriate checks, signed up the new tenants on a fixed term tenancy and they moved in during May 2015.

The tenants were a couple with three school-age children. As the parents were unemployed, the rent was payable directly from their WINZ benefit to Joe.

Joe then took over the management of the property.

He immediately encountered problems with late night partying disturbing other residents and undesirable acquaintances hanging around the property.

Matters came to a head in February 2016 when the tenants turned hostile.

A regular property inspection (as allowed under the Residential Tenancies Act) was carried out in July 2016. Four methamphetamine tests at that time give a positive result. That inspection also found that the tenants had done significant damage to the property.

Two weeks later, Joe was featured in a news article on the difficult lives that residential landlords lead, and in particular, the methamphetamine issue was discussed.

The following weekend the tenants at the property vacated without notice, despite the fixed-term tenancy still having seven months to run.

Although they had removed some of their possessions as they departed when Joe was authorised to enter the property by the Tenancy Tribunal he was faced with removing and dumping seven loads of worthless furniture and rubbish at a cost of $1638.

Joe’s insurance company required Joe to carry out further meth testing costing $552 at his own expense before they took any meaningful interest in Joe’s claim under the landlord’s extension to his house policy.

The insurance company then engaged their own meth testing agency to carry out more extensive testing and provide a report on the required remediation. These indicated serious levels of meth contamination so extensive that Joe is faced with stripping out all carpeting, soft board ceilings, wall linings, all the cabinets, cupboards, wardrobes, doors and possibly window frames removed, the new heat pump and even the kitchen stove. On this basis, Joe will be left with only the timber framing, exterior cladding, timber flooring and iron roof.

This work was carried out in November, and the necessary retest was done in early December and failed to meet the necessary standard. More work then took place over a further two weeks by the remediators and yet another test was done mid-December. This also failed. With contamination levels between 0.65 and 1.07 μg/100cm2 in places. Following even more work the property finally tested clear on 24th January, five months after the tenants vacated the property.

Soon after the tenants departed, Joe lodged a claim with the Tenancy Tribunal for access to the rental bond, which the tenants had lodged with tenancy Services. This bond, equal to four weeks rent, was eventually paid out to him but does not come anywhere near covering his actual costs. As Joe does not now know where the ex-tenants are living he cannot lodge a further claim against them for his losses as the window of opportunity that the claim process allows has now passed. In order to reopen the case, Joe applied for a continuation hearing at the end of October. The application was acknowledged, but he heard no more. Three months later he enquired what was happening about this application, and was astonished to get the response “it looks as though this has gone through a twist and perhaps the Court schedulers have missed our request.” Obviously no urgency there. With this astonishing inefficiency you have to ask are they working for the luckless landlord or the absconding tenant?

So eventually Joe has a decontaminated house back. A hollowed-out and stripped decontaminated house. No floor coverings, no stove, no light fittings, no curtains, no architraves, no ventilation system and a lot of the paint scraped down to bare timber. He now has his work cut out to get all of this back together into rent-able state. To make matters even worse, the actually physical damage that the tenants did to the property by breaking windows and damaging other parts of the property is classed as a separate claim (or most likely several separate claims) on his insurance, each which will be reduced in value by the amount of his excess.

Will this sad situation continue? Already landlords are dropping out of the housing market, insurance companies are talking of cutting back or even eliminating their meth remediation cover, and the rental housing shortage is getting worse. There is the prospect of an updated methamphetamine contamination Standard later this year. Will it suffice to solve the problem? Probably not. It is a social problem as well as a legislative one. Action is needed urgently to hold tenants such as these fully responsible for the damage they do and the stress they inflict on others.


Peter Lewis currently serves as the Vice President of the Auckland Property Investors' Association ("APIA").

 

The APIA, as well as the New Zealand Property Investors' Federation, have both put in submissions on Standards New Zealand's Draft Number DZ8510 - NZS8510 - Testing and decontamination of methamphetamine-contaminated properties.  Meth contamination is impacting the rental market in an unprecedently and destructive way.  We urge all landlords to participate in the consultation process to influence the outcome of the eventual standard.  Note that public submission for DZ8510 closes Monday 20th February.  Click here to download a copy of APIA's submission.

Recent Posts


Tags

opes partners Level 4 election 2017 DTI television RBNZ housing bubble Sponsored post data security p lab damage scotney williams smoke alarm insurance fixed-term tenancy extractor fan Must knows ocr Gluckman cash-flow Tribunal case study property apprentice election2020 property auckland council commerce commission Market report HHGA legal business heater capital gain Landlording termination mortgage market rent bond reserve bank meth contamination airbnb rent arrears rtaa2020 water bill HSWA will HHS early termination wealth creation trademe interest only buyer's agent kiwibuild mindset bankruptcy LIM twg report Standards New Zealand banking privacy wins Kris Pedersen Mortgages and Insurance return off the plan trust Holler trespass recycling equity financial advisers act government property cycle buying rules subdivision rta tax cat rent structure covid-19 Case study Property (Relationships) Act holiday house Investor story ring-fencing clnz property maintenance boarding house rent increase market Q&A interest rates RTAA 2019 watercare investment strategy tenancy services ventilation shower dome barfoot and thompson management letting TCIT khh minor dwelling rental wof negotiation Question and answer Guest blog sublease short-term rental property value gluckman report income inspection Jeff Bezos warm up new zealand Investment tip CCC principal and interest debt enforcement speculator rental market unitary plan first home buying lvr initio nzpif development yield anti-social behaviour worksafe How to investor tenancy tribunal house prices advice ask an expert tenant sale and purchase personal growth landlord auckland cgt rta reform warren buffett education anz robert kiyosaki bad tenant tenancy issues Must know building relationship productivity bond form equity beginner investor heating parry v inglis letting fee positive cash flow buying housing affordability property management re agent sale and purchas Editor's Choice meth skill shortage insulation CoreLogic winz finance asbestos partners renovation maintenance ird

Archive

Introducing Our Partners
Principal Sponsor - Kris Pedersen Mortgages & Insurance logo Gold Sponsor - Barfoot & Thompson logo Gold Sponsor - CoreLogic logo Property Apprentice logo The Insulation Warehouse logo The Renovation Team logo The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation logo
09 360 2376
info@apia.org.nz

The Tenancy Practice Service and TPS Credit Control work closely with the Auckland Property Investors' Association. Our vision of bringing helpful resources, documents and high quality services to Auckland Property Investors and Property Managers is shared by APIA, so its a partnership that works well. 

The Auckland Property Investors' Association is a great organisation for those who want access to advice and information from a range of industry experts and partners. 



Mathieu Holt- Managing Director, The Tenancy Practice Service & TPS Credit Control
Through the Association I found the channels and methods to fund the purchase of property I never dreamed about. Grant Brown

All round it has been one of those things Neil and I felt was really worthwhile belonging to. We have learned so much it has just built our confidence in what we are doing.

Janice Bieleski
I read two articles in the monthly magazine that saved me over $5,000. That is my membership fee for the next 26 years and I am sure I will learn a whole lot more! John Duncan
Fantastic organisation. The networking opportunities are brilliant and provide us with information and opportunities that cannot be obtained anywhere else. We learn something new at every meeting and we've been in this game for nearly 20 years. Pauline and Gyanen Kumar

I find the information obtained from various APIA meetings very useful in guiding my own property investment and rental management.  I also enjoy the networking opportunities with like-minded investors.  I am inspired by other investors’ success and find the more experiences and knowledge that I share with others, the more confident I become.  

Thanks to all APIA event organizers and administrators for your brilliant work. 

Stella Shao

I like talking to people and learning from their experience because it gives me the confidence to invest well. I think it is a knowledge thing. I now know I am doing things the right way.

Stephen Weatherall

My APIA membership has become a total success.

Every time I attend a monthly or regional meeting I come away with so many useful and positive tips that have added value to my property investments and management.

Not only that, the website is a great place for practical advice and useful information. It has now evolved into an important resource for my business.

Talk about value for money! The discounts I have been getting at Bunnings when I present my APIA membership card have more than paid for my annual subscription!

Tim Duffett, Plan A Investments Limited