APIA Blog

RSS Feed

Maximum occupancy - don’t sit on your rights

Wednesday, February 10, 2021

Knowledge or acquiescence of a tenant exceeding maximum occupancy could invalidate a subsequent claim for exemplary damage.

RE: Driskel v Zoetebier [2021] NZTT Hutt Valley 4271298, 4277832 

This is a claim and counterclaim hearing that covers a number of issues in connection to the tenancy. For the purpose of this discussion, we will be addressing the breach of maximum occupancy limit exclusively.

 

Facts
  • The tenancy agreement limits the occupancy to no more than 2.
  • The tenant had, from time to time, exceeded the maximum occupancy.
  • By all accounts, the landlords had been sufficiently present enough throughout the tenancy as to be aware of the actual number of occupants living at the property.
    • The tenant’s uncle - Though the landlords initially gave permission for the tenant’s uncle to move in temporarily, it had transpired subsequently (through inspections) that the uncle had indeed become a permanent resident at the property.
    • The tenant’s new partner - The landlords were aware of the tenant’s new partner moving into the property with her during the tenancy (and, in fact, engaged the partner’s trade services at the property from time to time).
  • Despite having knowledge that the tenant had breached the tenancy agreement, the landlords never issued any 14-day notices or sought to enforce their rights in this respect until after the tenancy had ended.

 

The law

Exceeding maximum occupancy is an unlawful act under the Residential Tenancies Act and can attract as much as $1,000 in exemplary damages.

 

The analysis 

The adjudicator’s own words can be understood plainly enough:

… although the tenancy agreement recorded that there were to be “two occupants” only, [the landlords], by their conduct, can be understood to have agreed to others occupying the property. If they wanted to make occupancy an issue they should have done so during the tenancy and not waited until the end of the tenancy. It is not reasonable to order exemplary damages in these circumstances.” (our bold)

 
The outcome

No exemplary damages were awarded in this instance.

 

Take-home for landlords

Don’t sit on your rights. It is unclear from the wording of the order whether a similar hard-line approach would be taken for other types of breaches by tenants. Given that it is relatively easy to enforce one’s tenancy rights by way of 14-day notices there is really no reason why any landlord would, in this stricter renting climate, acquiesce to any breaches suffered.

 

Overall helpfulness scale (Because let's be honest, Tribunal decisions can be a bit of a mess but still, landlords and tenants need all the help we can get!)
⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
 

 

Recent Posts


Tags

p lab bond form letting fee re agent subdivision market wins structure market rent trust robert kiyosaki kiwibuild warren buffett yield property cycle Standards New Zealand anti-social behaviour maintenance extractor fan tenancy issues television skill shortage Landlording housing affordability meth scotney williams election2020 asbestos winz ask an expert property apprentice investor buying property management personal growth recycling equity water bill anz negotiation privacy inspection election 2017 rent arrears lvr legal DTI rent landlord rental wof HSWA TCIT positive cash flow reserve bank beginner investor termination smoke alarm bad tenant sublease property heater Market report house prices early termination minor dwelling cat financial advisers act management banking shortland chartered accountants short-term rental ocr rta reform parry v inglis interest only buyer's agent ring-fencing khh interest rates opes partners renovation Case study Tribunal case study relationship How to property value finance boarding house bankruptcy return Question and answer holiday house ird warm up new zealand wealth creation quiet enjoyment nzpif meth contamination first home buying sale and purchase tenancy tribunal watercare property maintenance tenant auckland Must know apia unitary plan Kris Pedersen Mortgages and Insurance mindset trademe government Q&A interest deductibility damage auckland council tenancy services shower dome buying rules speculator Jeff Bezos investment strategy retaliatory notice data security insurance Guest blog covid-19 airbnb RTAA 2019 legal cost principal and interest cash-flow cgt rent increase Holler trespass gluckman report housing bubble Level 4 RBNZ tax Gluckman capital gain insulation business heat pump LIM income commerce commission mortgage Investor story will clnz rental market HHGA rta CoreLogic partners education debt enforcement daikin brightline rtaa2020 rent control development housing package Investment tip bond worksafe barfoot and thompson CCC advice productivity equity HHS building Editor's Choice sale and purchas ventilation initio off the plan heating Must knows letting Sponsored post Property (Relationships) Act fixed-term tenancy twg report

Archive

Introducing Our Partners
Principal Sponsor - Kris Pedersen Mortgages & Insurance logo Gold Sponsor - Barfoot & Thompson logo Gold Sponsor - CoreLogic logo Property Apprentice logo The Insulation Warehouse logo The Renovation Team logo The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation logo
09 360 2376
info@apia.org.nz

The Tenancy Practice Service and TPS Credit Control work closely with the Auckland Property Investors' Association. Our vision of bringing helpful resources, documents and high quality services to Auckland Property Investors and Property Managers is shared by APIA, so its a partnership that works well. 

The Auckland Property Investors' Association is a great organisation for those who want access to advice and information from a range of industry experts and partners. 



Mathieu Holt- Managing Director, The Tenancy Practice Service & TPS Credit Control
Through the Association I found the channels and methods to fund the purchase of property I never dreamed about. Grant Brown

All round it has been one of those things Neil and I felt was really worthwhile belonging to. We have learned so much it has just built our confidence in what we are doing.

Janice Bieleski
I read two articles in the monthly magazine that saved me over $5,000. That is my membership fee for the next 26 years and I am sure I will learn a whole lot more! John Duncan
Fantastic organisation. The networking opportunities are brilliant and provide us with information and opportunities that cannot be obtained anywhere else. We learn something new at every meeting and we've been in this game for nearly 20 years. Pauline and Gyanen Kumar

I find the information obtained from various APIA meetings very useful in guiding my own property investment and rental management.  I also enjoy the networking opportunities with like-minded investors.  I am inspired by other investors’ success and find the more experiences and knowledge that I share with others, the more confident I become.  

Thanks to all APIA event organizers and administrators for your brilliant work. 

Stella Shao

I like talking to people and learning from their experience because it gives me the confidence to invest well. I think it is a knowledge thing. I now know I am doing things the right way.

Stephen Weatherall

My APIA membership has become a total success.

Every time I attend a monthly or regional meeting I come away with so many useful and positive tips that have added value to my property investments and management.

Not only that, the website is a great place for practical advice and useful information. It has now evolved into an important resource for my business.

Talk about value for money! The discounts I have been getting at Bunnings when I present my APIA membership card have more than paid for my annual subscription!

Tim Duffett, Plan A Investments Limited