RSS Feed

Cause and consequence are two different things

Monday, December 14, 2020

Landlords seeking compensation for damages caused by tenants should take care to prove the cause, not just the consequences, of the damage as VNG RENTALS LIMITED vs Xu [2020] NZTT Auckland 4269426 demonstrates.

  • On or about 2 May 2020, the bathroom of the apartment flooded. Water leaked into the adjoining apartment resulting in an approx $4.5K damage.
  • In an email to the tenants on 2 May 2020, the landlord’s representative stated, “According to the plumber’s advice, it is highly like tenants’ hair stopping the drain up, and which has even led to your neighbor unit 903’s carpet gets wet (sic)”.
  • On or about 5 May 2020, the building manager and contractor attended the site to clean up and repair.
The claim

The landlord applied to the Tribunal for compensation on the basis that the tenant had caused the damage and provided the following to support its claim:

  • copy of the invoice from the building manager stating ‘water leakage damage inspection during day off’; 
  • copy of the invoice from carpet cleaning contractor;
  • photographs of the damage; and 
  • record of aforementioned 2 May email to the tenant

Note the landlord did not provide: 

  • copy of plumber’s invoice; nor
  • plumber’s advice of the likely cause of the flooding (i.e. tenant’s hair)


The law
The adjudicator summaries the tenant’s obligations vis-à-vis damages to the property under ss 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B of the Residential Tenancies Act thus:

A landlord must prove that the damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission.



The adjudicator considers the ‘[e]vidence as to the cause of the flood is essential to the applicant’s claim’ and is critical of its absence (the landlord had proved that the flooding occurred but not who/what caused the flooding in the first place). Curiously the inference is that the adjudicator had not ruled out fair wear and tear as having caused the flooding. 



Adjudicator Beaumont dismissed the application criticising the landlord’s evidence as falling short of proving the cause of the flood stating ‘[p]roduction of invoices and photographs are not evidence of the cause of the damage, only of the consequences thereof.’


Take-home for landlords
  • Evidence of damage is not the same as evidence of the cause of damage
    • It is one thing to prove that the flooding had occurred, it is another to prove what/who caused the flooding.
  • Any claims alleging the tenant as having caused the damage should be supported by evidence.
    • In this instance, the landlord would have been better served if it had provided pictures of any hair retrieved from the drain and/or report/invoice from the plumber noting clogged hair as the cause of the flooding.        
  • Hearsay evidence for the cause of the damage (i.e. the email of 2 May) is insufficient. If your contractor ever opines on who/what have likely caused damage to the property then make sure he puts that opinion down in writing.

Overall helpfulness scale (Because let's be honest, Tribunal decisions can be a bit of a mess but still, landlords and tenants need all the help we can get!)
⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️


Recent Posts


tenancy tribunal warren buffett income productivity khh fixed-term tenancy reserve bank cat Must know unitary plan initio sale and purchase banking Guest blog meth contamination holiday house inspection tenancy issues insulation building mortgage property apprentice damage principal and interest interest only shortland chartered accountants Case study Holler mindset meth Question and answer legal cost capital gain Editor's Choice advice education development quiet enjoyment positive cash flow tenancy services market rent short-term rental heat pump DTI Kris Pedersen Mortgages and Insurance How to recycling equity equity Sponsored post smoke alarm sale and purchas election2020 ventilation personal growth Must knows rental market bankruptcy letting nzpif rent Q&A legal shower dome RBNZ twg report heater privacy ask an expert yield buying rtaa2020 finance p lab interest deductibility first home buying Zodiak Management winz inflation interest rates landlord speculator HHGA TCIT management buying rules Tribunal case study auckland ring-fencing HSWA trespass investment strategy clnz worksafe warm up new zealand commerce commission cgt tax buyer's agent short term rental property value rental wof retaliatory notice housing package house prices structure CCC anz Investor story auckland council Level 4 minor dwelling Property (Relationships) Act tenant lvr trust television debt enforcement off the plan ird HHS RTAA 2019 termination scotney williams negotiation parry v inglis ocr interest limitation bad tenant daikin heating rent arrears gluckman report maintenance barfoot and thompson will partners CoreLogic debt to income rent control beginner investor apia Standards New Zealand Investment tip trademe travel bubble election 2017 housing affordability property business asbestos robert kiyosaki kiwibuild boarding house early termination Gluckman rta reform water bill property cycle rent increase housing bubble LIM bond form property maintenance wins sublease brightline rta property management cash-flow bond government opes partners data security insurance skill shortage investor Landlording relationship covid-19 market airbnb Jeff Bezos letting fee watercare financial advisers act return Market report extractor fan renovation anti-social behaviour wealth creation subdivision re agent


Introducing Our Partners
Principal Sponsor - Kris Pedersen Mortgages & Insurance logo Gold Sponsor - Barfoot & Thompson logo Gold Sponsor - CoreLogic logo Property Apprentice logo The Insulation Warehouse logo The Renovation Team logo The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation logo